Correlation between Corrected Horspower and at the track
Moderator: Team
Correlation between Corrected Horspower and at the track
Just a few questions . We purchased a turnkey late 90s NHRA Pro Stock . Best et for the Engine was 7.09 when leased by Robert Patrick from Ralpph Ferra. Engine showed 1275HP at the track. Engine was freshened and returned to Ralph whio then slotted it back onto his PRobe and apparently hasnt raced it since it was freshened. Also I was told that they Got another 20 more steam from the engine in the freshen up with different exhaust valves, and upping compression 1/2 point.
We pulled engine out and put it on the pump just to get a baseline here yesterday ...yesterday was a pretty hot day here in Brisbane and room was at 3800-3900fy with 20.55% O2 1.07 HP Correction.
Did 7 pulls on C25 Best corrected HP was 1099.5 HP at 8700 peak TQ was 721 Ft-Lb at 7300RPM. Brake Speficic was spot on at .400.
Only thing that wasnt right and we are correcting it next week is the Collector had to be effectively lengthend with a 4.5 inch bend to hook up to the 6 inch Dyno Cell exhasut.. but i done think this would have a 175HP effect or would it........ aslso my question to you guys is with scoop pressure etc what does this correlate to HP at the track etc with your experience......also we were ramping the engine at 600RPM/sec. Bellow is Dyno sheet and PIc of Exhaaust
We pulled engine out and put it on the pump just to get a baseline here yesterday ...yesterday was a pretty hot day here in Brisbane and room was at 3800-3900fy with 20.55% O2 1.07 HP Correction.
Did 7 pulls on C25 Best corrected HP was 1099.5 HP at 8700 peak TQ was 721 Ft-Lb at 7300RPM. Brake Speficic was spot on at .400.
Only thing that wasnt right and we are correcting it next week is the Collector had to be effectively lengthend with a 4.5 inch bend to hook up to the 6 inch Dyno Cell exhasut.. but i done think this would have a 175HP effect or would it........ aslso my question to you guys is with scoop pressure etc what does this correlate to HP at the track etc with your experience......also we were ramping the engine at 600RPM/sec. Bellow is Dyno sheet and PIc of Exhaaust
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 4:04 pm
- Location: Abbeville, LA
- Contact:
Just a few questions . We purchased a turnkey late 90s NHRA Pro Stock . Best et for the Engine was 7.09 when leased by Robert Patrick from Ralpph Ferra. Engine showed 1275HP at the track. Engine was freshened and returned to Ralph whio then slotted it back onto his PRobe and apparently hasnt raced it since it was freshened. Also I was told that they Got another 20 more steam from the engine in the freshen up with different exhaust valves, and upping compression 1/2 point.
still haven't figured out how to format this data
but from your Fuel Consumed in Lbs/Hour
the A/F Ratio is on the "lean-side"
and usually the peak Ve% is somewhere between Peak TQ RPM
and Peak HP RPM..but yours is above the Peak HP RPM
along with VE% Curve having multiple peaks and valleys , this shows
Intake and Exhaust Systems not working together in your desired RPM range
We pulled engine out and put it on the pump just to get a baseline here yesterday ...yesterday was a pretty hot day here in Brisbane and room was at 3800-3900fy with 20.55% O2 1.07 HP Correction.
Did 7 pulls on C25 Best corrected HP was 1099.5 HP at 8700 peak TQ was 721 Ft-Lb at 7300RPM. Brake Speficic was spot on at .400.
Only thing that wasnt right and we are correcting it next week is the Collector had to be effectively lengthend with a 4.5 inch bend to hook up to the 6 inch Dyno Cell exhasut.. but i done think this would have a 175HP effect or would it........ aslso my question to you guys is with scoop pressure etc what does this correlate to HP at the track etc with your experience......also we were ramping the engine at 600RPM/sec. Bellow is Dyno sheet and PIc of Exhaaust
Code: Select all
CID= 499.665 --- Fuel Consumed in Lbs/Hour ---
CFM @ 12.5:1 13.2:1 14.0:1 14.7:1 16.0:1 Fuel Engine
Engine 125.0 A/F A/F A/F A/F A/F Heat Friction
RPM Ve % Lbs/Hr Lbs/Hr Lbs/Hr Lbs/Hr Lbs/Hr HP HP
6500 1174.7 344.2 325.9 307.3 292.7 268.9 2446 185.9
6600 1192.8 349.5 330.9 312.0 297.2 273.0 2484 192.1
6700 1210.9 354.8 336.0 316.8 301.7 277.2 2521 199.3
6800 1228.9 360.1 341.0 321.5 306.2 281.3 2559 207.0
6900 1247.0 365.4 346.0 326.2 310.7 285.4 2596 214.8
7000 1265.1 370.7 351.0 330.9 315.2 289.6 2634 222.7
7100 1283.1 375.9 356.0 335.7 319.7 293.7 2672 230.8
7200 1301.2 381.2 361.0 340.4 324.2 297.8 2709 239.0
7300 1319.3 386.5 366.0 345.1 328.7 302.0 2747 247.4
7400 1337.4 391.8 371.1 349.9 333.2 306.1 2785 255.8
7500 1355.4 397.1 376.1 354.6 337.7 310.3 2822 264.6
7600 1373.5 402.4 381.1 359.3 342.2 314.4 2860 273.8
7700 1391.6 407.7 386.1 364.0 346.7 318.5 2897 283.2
7800 1409.6 413.0 391.1 368.8 351.2 322.7 2935 292.7
7900 1427.7 418.3 396.1 373.5 355.7 326.8 2973 302.4
8000 1445.8 423.6 401.1 378.2 360.2 330.9 3010 312.2
8100 1463.9 428.9 406.2 382.9 364.7 335.1 3048 322.1
8200 1481.9 434.2 411.2 387.7 369.2 339.2 3086 332.2
8300 1500.0 439.5 416.2 392.4 373.7 343.4 3123 342.5
8400 1518.1 444.8 421.2 397.1 378.2 347.5 3161 353.4
8500 1536.2 450.1 426.2 401.9 382.7 351.6 3199 364.4
CID= 499.665 --- Fuel Consumed in Lbs/Hour ---
CFM @ 12.5:1 13.2:1 14.0:1 14.7:1 16.0:1 Fuel Engine
Engine 125.0 A/F A/F A/F A/F A/F Heat Friction
RPM Ve % Lbs/Hr Lbs/Hr Lbs/Hr Lbs/Hr Lbs/Hr HP HP
8600 1554.2 455.4 431.2 406.6 387.2 355.8 3236 375.6
8700 1572.3 460.7 436.2 411.3 391.7 359.9 3274 387.0
8800 1590.4 466.0 441.3 416.0 396.2 364.0 3311 398.5
8900 1608.4 471.3 446.3 420.8 400.7 368.2 3349 410.2
9000 1626.5 476.6 451.3 425.5 405.2 372.3 3387 422.0
9100 1644.6 481.8 456.3 430.2 409.7 376.4 3424 434.0
9200 1662.7 487.1 461.3 435.0 414.2 380.6 3462 446.7
9300 1680.7 492.4 466.3 439.7 418.7 384.7 3500 459.5
9400 1698.8 497.7 471.3 444.4 423.2 388.9 3537 472.6
9500 1716.9 503.0 476.4 449.1 427.7 393.0 3575 485.8
9600 1735.0 508.3 481.4 453.9 432.2 397.1 3612 499.1
9700 1753.0 513.6 486.4 458.6 436.8 401.3 3650 512.7
9800 1771.1 518.9 491.4 463.3 441.3 405.4 3688 526.4
9900 1789.2 524.2 496.4 468.0 445.8 409.5 3725 540.3
10000 1807.2 529.5 501.4 472.8 450.3 413.7 3763 554.4
10100 1825.3 534.8 506.4 477.5 454.8 417.8 3801 568.6
10200 1843.4 540.1 511.5 482.2 459.3 422.0 3838 583.1
10300 1861.5 545.4 516.5 487.0 463.8 426.1 3876 597.6
10400 1879.5 550.7 521.5 491.7 468.3 430.2 3914 612.4
10500 1897.6 556.0 526.5 496.4 472.8 434.4 3951 627.3
still haven't figured out how to format this data
but from your Fuel Consumed in Lbs/Hour
the A/F Ratio is on the "lean-side"
and usually the peak Ve% is somewhere between Peak TQ RPM
and Peak HP RPM..but yours is above the Peak HP RPM
along with VE% Curve having multiple peaks and valleys , this shows
Intake and Exhaust Systems not working together in your desired RPM range
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 4:04 pm
- Location: Abbeville, LA
- Contact:
download and run this program and see if ET/MPH incrementals
correlate to your Dyno and DragStrip data ????
http://www.maxracesoftware.com/products.htm
ET_Analyst for DragRacers ETAVBWIN version 1.00
Load the PROSTOCK file (its default anyways)
and adjust Inputs to match your Dyno Track Data and see how close it is
also your 69.0 Ve% is multiplied by 2 = 138.0 VE at 8900 RPM
your Fuel Consumed at 8700 RPM = 395.8
thats right about 14.4:1 ..thats pretty close to what i like to see
on my Dyno at 600 RPM/SEC on this kind of Engine
maybe still lean ?
your A/f Ratios also get doubled like your 8.90 at 8700 rpm = 17.8:1
so thats showing the Air Turbine may be calibrated too high
(along with your 138.0 Ve readings ) probably your BSAC's are showing
high, maybe into 6's(when doubled)
also your Torque is way too low
again showing too large taper + too short intake runner
to tune-in at 8700 rpm..that could be splitting up the Ve Curve
along with adding exhaust pipes/mufflers to Headers
correlate to your Dyno and DragStrip data ????
http://www.maxracesoftware.com/products.htm
ET_Analyst for DragRacers ETAVBWIN version 1.00
Load the PROSTOCK file (its default anyways)
and adjust Inputs to match your Dyno Track Data and see how close it is
also your 69.0 Ve% is multiplied by 2 = 138.0 VE at 8900 RPM
your Fuel Consumed at 8700 RPM = 395.8
thats right about 14.4:1 ..thats pretty close to what i like to see
on my Dyno at 600 RPM/SEC on this kind of Engine
maybe still lean ?
your A/f Ratios also get doubled like your 8.90 at 8700 rpm = 17.8:1
so thats showing the Air Turbine may be calibrated too high
(along with your 138.0 Ve readings ) probably your BSAC's are showing
high, maybe into 6's(when doubled)
also your Torque is way too low
again showing too large taper + too short intake runner
to tune-in at 8700 rpm..that could be splitting up the Ve Curve
along with adding exhaust pipes/mufflers to Headers
Last edited by maxracesoftware on Sun Dec 25, 2005 7:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 4:04 pm
- Location: Abbeville, LA
- Contact:
http://www.maxracesoftware.com/Dyno_Wire_Cover3.jpg
i know your Fuel Consumed Curve looks about OK ,
but i thought i might pass this Info along to you and others
if you look at that Pic of my Harwood Dyno Fuel Cell,
there's a little round Chrome Vent on the Cap,
underneath this Chrome Vent Cover was only (1) .060" hole
and coupled together with the fact that Chrome Cover as it came
from Harwood was dug-in and sunken into the plastic enough to
further choke off venting ...result was => around 900 HP i was actually running out of gasoline ......i removed that Chrome Cap and drilled
5 more holes then placed a washer so the cover wouldn't sink into the
plastic to get full venting...this result was i now had enough fuel
flow for 2500 HP on gasoline .(there's also a return line that can't be seen)
its important to get very adequate venting and return to gas tank
from your Dyno Fuel System.
i know your Fuel Consumed Curve looks about OK ,
but i thought i might pass this Info along to you and others
if you look at that Pic of my Harwood Dyno Fuel Cell,
there's a little round Chrome Vent on the Cap,
underneath this Chrome Vent Cover was only (1) .060" hole
and coupled together with the fact that Chrome Cover as it came
from Harwood was dug-in and sunken into the plastic enough to
further choke off venting ...result was => around 900 HP i was actually running out of gasoline ......i removed that Chrome Cap and drilled
5 more holes then placed a washer so the cover wouldn't sink into the
plastic to get full venting...this result was i now had enough fuel
flow for 2500 HP on gasoline .(there's also a return line that can't be seen)
its important to get very adequate venting and return to gas tank
from your Dyno Fuel System.
Hi,
As much as most of us would like the dyno numbers to line up with the track numbers, they usually don't.Larry's probably got the only system in the country that does. Lol. I know that prostock guys now will take their engines to a competitors dyno just to try and get numbers that make sense. I would tune it for trends and put it in the car and see what happens.
Shawn
As much as most of us would like the dyno numbers to line up with the track numbers, they usually don't.Larry's probably got the only system in the country that does. Lol. I know that prostock guys now will take their engines to a competitors dyno just to try and get numbers that make sense. I would tune it for trends and put it in the car and see what happens.
Shawn
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 4:04 pm
- Location: Abbeville, LA
- Contact:
i haven't yet tried this Software out ,
but Patrick Hale's website has a few ScreenShots/Data Pics
you might Email him for additional Info ?
http://quarterjr.com/clutch_pro.htm
also checkout his other Software such as
Quarter Jr and the Professional Versions
but Patrick Hale's website has a few ScreenShots/Data Pics
you might Email him for additional Info ?
http://quarterjr.com/clutch_pro.htm
also checkout his other Software such as
Quarter Jr and the Professional Versions
With such a relatively large engine and matching collector size (5"?), I wonder if the step up to the 6" dyno exhaust 'looks' like a big, long collector to the engine, instead of representing open atmosphere? Any chance of a pull with open, as-raced collectors?
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.
Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
looks like a lot of power drop above peak hp. Your cfm reading was showing some possible valvetrain issues too, since it stopped increasing sooner than it should have. Is this a 55mm cam? What intake lobe lift, rocker ratio, and valve spring is on it? What kind of pushrods?
Interesting torque curve too. Looks like the torque starts to fall then comes back up a little. Never seen that on a 2X4 sheetmetal manifold deal before. Happens a lot with cast single 4 stuff with short and long runners. Makes me agree that the headers or ex size is not working well with your manifold runner lengths/taper.
Interesting torque curve too. Looks like the torque starts to fall then comes back up a little. Never seen that on a 2X4 sheetmetal manifold deal before. Happens a lot with cast single 4 stuff with short and long runners. Makes me agree that the headers or ex size is not working well with your manifold runner lengths/taper.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:19 pm
- Location: Dillsburg, PA
- Contact:
found the problem today ...since we purchased the engine and car turnkey we put it on the pump to get a baseline out here..... its blown a head gasket between 5 and 6 ....it was like that when we recieved it as there was only 10HP between the 8 pulls that we did ..and it finally pulled in water on the last pull yesterday. we fixed the dyno cell exhaust puting the 6 inch right up to the end of the 4.5 collector .....it actually droped 10HP doing that ...
i was told the engine was freshened and had only dyno time but after pulling heads off the pistons look like they have done a season so shorts coming apart and i'll see what else awaits..
i was told the engine was freshened and had only dyno time but after pulling heads off the pistons look like they have done a season so shorts coming apart and i'll see what else awaits..