602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

dirtracr5
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1494
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:29 pm
Location:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by dirtracr5 »

raceman14 wrote:Looking at the rules I must be missing something.
Built engine gets :
As good or better head choice
Better intake manifold
Open flat tappet camshaft
No RPM limiter
Any race gas

you must be looking at the wrong rules. open engine gets worse heads (smog 76cc heads no work allowed) spec intake (edelbrock 2701 no work allowed) limited flat tappet (.842 roller tip rockers and 3/8 studs only) non oxygenated gas only no ethanol or methanol. compression rule is 9 to 1.
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10717
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by CamKing »

dirtracr5 wrote: limited flat tappet (.842 roller tip rockers and 3/8 studs only)
What limit? We're running 249@.050" with .575" net lift solid flat tappet. The crate is stuck with a 212/224 .435" hydraulic flat tappet.
Any engine builder that can't build an engine that'll put 40hp on those crate engines should find a new career.

PS, we're doing this with the edelbrock 2-plane. Wait until we get the single plane figured out.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
MidgetMotorsports07
Member
Member
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:27 am
Location:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by MidgetMotorsports07 »

We can run the EQ head also but I don't think they flow as well as a Vortec either. I have seen one sport mod engine make 425+ but It was an EQ headed 355 with a lot of "work" done to it.
MidgetMotorsports07
Member
Member
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:27 am
Location:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by MidgetMotorsports07 »

CamKing wrote:
dirtracr5 wrote: limited flat tappet (.842 roller tip rockers and 3/8 studs only)
What limit? We're running 249@.050" with .575" net lift solid flat tappet. The crate is stuck with a 212/224 .435" hydraulic flat tappet.
Any engine builder that can't build an engine that'll put 40hp on those crate engines should find a new career.

PS, we're doing this with the edelbrock 2-plane. Wait until we get the single plane figured out.
I think the single plane would work ok Mike, but we are limited to a 1 inch carb spacer and the edelbrock is already taller than the Weiand.
1997bird
Member
Member
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 1:54 am
Location:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by 1997bird »

dirtracr5 wrote:
raceman14 wrote:Looking at the rules I must be missing something.
Built engine gets :
As good or better head choice
Better intake manifold
Open flat tappet camshaft
No RPM limiter
Any race gas

you must be looking at the wrong rules. open engine gets worse heads (smog 76cc heads no work allowed) spec intake (edelbrock 2701 no work allowed) limited flat tappet (.842 roller tip rockers and 3/8 studs only) non oxygenated gas only no ethanol or methanol. compression rule is 9 to 1.
Which class are you looking at? I assume your looking at a hobby stock, but the rules tha were kind of outlined are for a Sport Mod. The Sport Mods are limited by 175 psi cranking compression after 5 revolutions of the engine. You can almost get 11.5:1 SCR if you know what your doing and still be IMCA legal. IIf you look at the rules there is an advantage to stay with a GM 487 or 487x head castings over the IMCA EQ head that can have nothing more than it being flat milled. If you can't crack more than 400 HP with a 0-4412 carb then you may want to start consulting another builder, with last years rules of having to have 12" of vaccum @ 1200 rpm & a hyd flat tappet cam we were seeing 410-425 HP. With being able to use a solid cam and no vaccum rule this year that opens up even more HP to be had over the crate engine.
dirtracr5
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1494
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:29 pm
Location:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by dirtracr5 »

CamKing wrote:What limit?
limited to me is the stock dia lifter, roller tips only and 3.8 studs. also no girdles. if it were not limited we'd be talking about larger lifters, shaft rockers or at least a 7/16 stud and some much higher rocker ratios. i dont see anything more than a 1.6 surviving the current rules.
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10717
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by CamKing »

MidgetMotorsports07 wrote:I think the single plane would work ok Mike, but we are limited to a 1 inch carb spacer and the edelbrock is already taller than the Weiand.
It's only taller because it's a 2-pane. Look at the plenum size. Distribution is an issue with the Weiand, but I think I may have an answer for that. I think if we do it right, we can pick up 20hp at 6,800, over the Edelbrock.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
dirtracr5
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1494
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:29 pm
Location:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by dirtracr5 »

1997bird wrote:Which class are you looking at? I assume your looking at a hobby stock, but the rules tha were kind of outlined are for a Sport Mod. The Sport Mods are limited by 175 psi cranking compression after 5 revolutions of the engine. You can almost get 11.5:1 SCR if you know what your doing and still be IMCA legal. IIf you look at the rules there is an advantage to stay with a GM 487 or 487x head castings over the IMCA EQ head that can have nothing more than it being flat milled. If you can't crack more than 400 HP with a 0-4412 carb then you may want to start consulting another builder, with last years rules of having to have 12" of vaccum @ 1200 rpm & a hyd flat tappet cam we were seeing 410-425 HP. With being able to use a solid cam and no vaccum rule this year that opens up even more HP to be had over the crate engine.

im looking at imca northern sport mod rules which is what the OP is asking about.

https://imca.com/wp-content/uploads/201 ... rtmod3.pdf

rules clearly state 9 to 1 and solid cams have always been allowed. never had a vacuum rule either. not sure what rules you are reffering to?
Last edited by dirtracr5 on Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10717
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by CamKing »

dirtracr5 wrote:
CamKing wrote:What limit?
limited to me is the stock dia lifter, roller tips only and 3.8 studs. also no girdles. if it were not limited we'd be talking about larger lifters, shaft rockers or at least a 7/16 stud and some much higher rocker ratios. i dont see anything more than a 1.6 surviving the current rules.
The 602 has the same .842" diameter lifters, but is also limited to Hydraulic flat tappet lifters, and limited to a 212/224, .334" GM spec cam.
That's what I call a limit.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
MidgetMotorsports07
Member
Member
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:27 am
Location:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by MidgetMotorsports07 »

1997bird wrote:
dirtracr5 wrote:
raceman14 wrote:Looking at the rules I must be missing something.
Built engine gets :
As good or better head choice
Better intake manifold
Open flat tappet camshaft
No RPM limiter
Any race gas

you must be looking at the wrong rules. open engine gets worse heads (smog 76cc heads no work allowed) spec intake (edelbrock 2701 no work allowed) limited flat tappet (.842 roller tip rockers and 3/8 studs only) non oxygenated gas only no ethanol or methanol. compression rule is 9 to 1.
Which class are you looking at? I assume your looking at a hobby stock, but the rules tha were kind of outlined are for a Sport Mod. The Sport Mods are limited by 175 psi cranking compression after 5 revolutions of the engine. You can almost get 11.5:1 SCR if you know what your doing and still be IMCA legal. IIf you look at the rules there is an advantage to stay with a GM 487 or 487x head castings over the IMCA EQ head that can have nothing more than it being flat milled. If you can't crack more than 400 HP with a 0-4412 carb then you may want to start consulting another builder, with last years rules of having to have 12" of vaccum @ 1200 rpm & a hyd flat tappet cam we were seeing 410-425 HP. With being able to use a solid cam and no vaccum rule this year that opens up even more HP to be had over the crate engine.
Maximum compression ratio is 9.0 to 1, no tolerance. Compression ratio checked using Whistler and cubic inches checked using pump, OR by visual inspection of part and/or casting numbers, pistons.



That is directly from the website!!!!
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10717
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by CamKing »

With Wistler, 9.2:1 checks as 9.0:1

Do they CC the heads?, or do you just have to check at 9:1
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
1997bird
Member
Member
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 1:54 am
Location:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by 1997bird »

dirtracr5 wrote:
1997bird wrote:Which class are you looking at? I assume your looking at a hobby stock, but the rules tha were kind of outlined are for a Sport Mod. The Sport Mods are limited by 175 psi cranking compression after 5 revolutions of the engine. You can almost get 11.5:1 SCR if you know what your doing and still be IMCA legal. IIf you look at the rules there is an advantage to stay with a GM 487 or 487x head castings over the IMCA EQ head that can have nothing more than it being flat milled. If you can't crack more than 400 HP with a 0-4412 carb then you may want to start consulting another builder, with last years rules of having to have 12" of vaccum @ 1200 rpm & a hyd flat tappet cam we were seeing 410-425 HP. With being able to use a solid cam and no vaccum rule this year that opens up even more HP to be had over the crate engine.

im looking at imca northern sport mod rules which is what the OP is asking about.

https://imca.com/wp-content/uploads/201 ... rtmod3.pdf

rules clearly state 9 to 1 and solid cams have always been allowed. never had a vacuum rule either. not sure what rules you are reffering to?
IMCA Southern Sport Mod
dirtracr5
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1494
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:29 pm
Location:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by dirtracr5 »

[quote="CamKing]The 602 has the same .842" diameter lifters, but is also limited to Hydraulic flat tappet lifters, and limited to a 212/224, .334" GM spec cam.
That's what I call a limit.[/quote]

my comments were in referance to raceman14s posts about unlimited valvetrain. never was comparing anything to a crate valvetrain.
dirtracr5
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1494
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:29 pm
Location:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by dirtracr5 »

1997bird wrote:
dirtracr5 wrote:
1997bird wrote:Which class are you looking at? I assume your looking at a hobby stock, but the rules tha were kind of outlined are for a Sport Mod. The Sport Mods are limited by 175 psi cranking compression after 5 revolutions of the engine. You can almost get 11.5:1 SCR if you know what your doing and still be IMCA legal. IIf you look at the rules there is an advantage to stay with a GM 487 or 487x head castings over the IMCA EQ head that can have nothing more than it being flat milled. If you can't crack more than 400 HP with a 0-4412 carb then you may want to start consulting another builder, with last years rules of having to have 12" of vaccum @ 1200 rpm & a hyd flat tappet cam we were seeing 410-425 HP. With being able to use a solid cam and no vaccum rule this year that opens up even more HP to be had over the crate engine.

im looking at imca northern sport mod rules which is what the OP is asking about.

https://imca.com/wp-content/uploads/201 ... rtmod3.pdf

rules clearly state 9 to 1 and solid cams have always been allowed. never had a vacuum rule either. not sure what rules you are reffering to?
IMCA Southern Sport Mod

gotcha thats a totally different ballgame than what we are talking about. dont they allow quadrajets down south?
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10717
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: 602 GM Crate vs. Built Engine

Post by CamKing »

BTW, I'd look at the GM heads, and go with bigger valves. The EQ is stuck with the 1.94"
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
Post Reply