Starter Question

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

toolmakeron
Pro
Pro
Posts: 401
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:16 pm
Location: Calgary, Canada

Starter Question

Post by toolmakeron »

I see starters advertised in Ft Lb of Torque, Then I see them listed in H.P. How do I find out the strongest starter, for a hi comp engine.I'm sure there has to be a conversion or chart to learn from. Any help is appreciated, Thanks Guys
Custombalancing.com
We Make Honey Out of Dogshit*
* some conditions apply.
Hectori
Pro
Pro
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 9:09 am
Location:

Re: Starter Question

Post by Hectori »

I thing that you need RPM or Time variable to be able to compare apples to apples. But many manufacturers tell the maximum CR that should be used. MSD DynaForce startes say 18:1 and Powermaster Ultra Torque 15:1 for example.
amc fan
Expert
Expert
Posts: 598
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:03 am
Location: BETHLEHEM PENNA.

Re: Starter Question

Post by amc fan »

Horsepower & torque relationship: T=HPX63025/RPM ....HP=T X RPM/63025 T=torque in (lb-in).......T=HPX5252/RPM HP=T X RPM/5252 Torque in(lb-ft
governor
Expert
Expert
Posts: 630
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:12 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Starter Question

Post by governor »

Buy the best gear reduction unit your budget will allow.

Gov
a passion for racing
toolmakeron
Pro
Pro
Posts: 401
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:16 pm
Location: Calgary, Canada

Re: Starter Question

Post by toolmakeron »

Has anyone ever seen the RPM mentioned with starters? The formula that amc gave is great, but without RPM, I think you are lost. I bought a MSD awhile ago & I didn't see any RPM info. Can someone prove me wrong? I think the RPM will depend on the battery condition. Thanks Guys
Custombalancing.com
We Make Honey Out of Dogshit*
* some conditions apply.
Hectori
Pro
Pro
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 9:09 am
Location:

Re: Starter Question

Post by Hectori »

toolmakeron wrote:Has anyone ever seen the RPM mentioned with starters?
I have never seen RPM mentioned, and i think that it because electric motors have full torque from the start. so you can try to compare hp and torque with low RPM`s. Just a thought thou, i am not electrical engineer.

But for accurate comparing of torque and HP, you need either Time or RPM factor. That means like ft·lbf/sec Or RPM.
barnym17
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1353
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 4:37 pm
Location:

Re: Starter Question

Post by barnym17 »

All you need is watts, it directly converts to h.p.
Warpspeed
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1227
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 4:10 pm
Location:

Re: Starter Question

Post by Warpspeed »

governor wrote:Buy the best gear reduction unit your budget will allow.
Gov
+1
Cheers, Tony.
BCjohnny
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:07 pm
Location: Black Country, England

Re: Starter Question

Post by BCjohnny »

There are two distinct phases that the starter has to overcome in starting an engine.

The first, and most crucial, is the starter's ability to get the engine moving from rest, or breakaway torque. A DC motor exhibits it's greatest torque output, thus amp draw, at the point just before it stalls. This is where geared starters excel.

Secondly as the starter speed builds its torque output falls, as does amp draw, the back EMF being generated within the motor opposing the current draw. Horsepower is increasing. At some point an equilibrium is reached where the power/gearing is matched by engine load and you have cranking speed. This is where the HP rating comes in, and how starters are conveniently rated.

What's it all mean? The hardest thing a starter has to do is the breakaway torque phase so if it can achieve this in any given application, the rest pretty much looks after itself. A geared starter around 2.2kw will start almost any automotive petrol V8 and the space envelope and weight are so minimal compared to one of around 1.4kw it doesn't usually make much sense to pick the smaller unit, certainly when you get to around 6 litres or more.

Construction, design and country of origin deserve more consideration. PMGRs are often lighter for any given rating, but have drawbacks. A new or even rebuilt OE unit is usually far better than a copy, but some OE units are better suited to harsher enviroments than others
User avatar
af2
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7014
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills

Re: Starter Question

Post by af2 »

BCjohnny wrote:There are two distinct phases that the starter has to overcome in starting an engine.

The first, and most crucial, is the starter's ability to get the engine moving from rest, or breakaway torque. A DC motor exhibits it's greatest torque output, thus amp draw, at the point just before it stalls. This is where geared starters excel.

Secondly as the starter speed builds its torque output falls, as does amp draw, the back EMF being generated within the motor opposing the current draw. Horsepower is increasing. At some point an equilibrium is reached where the power/gearing is matched by engine load and you have cranking speed. This is where the HP rating comes in, and how starters are conveniently rated.

What's it all mean? The hardest thing a starter has to do is the breakaway torque phase so if it can achieve this in any given application, the rest pretty much looks after itself. A geared starter around 2.2kw will start almost any automotive petrol V8 and the space envelope and weight are so minimal compared to one of around 1.4kw it doesn't usually make much sense to pick the smaller unit, certainly when you get to around 6 litres or more.

Construction, design and country of origin deserve more consideration. PMGRs are often lighter for any given rating, but have drawbacks. A new or even rebuilt OE unit is usually far better than a copy, but some OE units are better suited to harsher enviroments than others
I could not have explained it better!! Very good post!!
GURU is only a name.
Adam
Krooser
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1857
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: Tropical Wisconsin

Re: Starter Question

Post by Krooser »

Great subject.
Honored to be a member of the Luxemburg Speedway Hall of Fame Class of 2019
BCjohnny
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:07 pm
Location: Black Country, England

Re: Starter Question

Post by BCjohnny »

af2 wrote:I could not have explained it better!! Very good post!!
Thanks...... I spent most of the nineties, before I sold up, designing and manufacturing high performance starter applications, so it's one of the very few things I actually do understand, lol. I learnt a lot, and curiously for someone over here, a fair chunk of it was getting 510/540 BBCs to light off almost regardless. If I can help with anything, ask.
toolmakeron
Pro
Pro
Posts: 401
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:16 pm
Location: Calgary, Canada

Re: Starter Question

Post by toolmakeron »

Here's another follow up question,the choice I'm looking at is, 180 ft. lbs torque, OR 3 h.p.( is this all just marketing hype) The 3 h.p. sounds high to me , but the seller swears to it. Opinions, advice, or any input to this one??? Thanks guys
Custombalancing.com
We Make Honey Out of Dogshit*
* some conditions apply.
User avatar
af2
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7014
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills

Re: Starter Question

Post by af2 »

toolmakeron wrote:Here's another follow up question,the choice I'm looking at is, 180 ft. lbs torque, OR 3 h.p.( is this all just marketing hype) The 3 h.p. sounds high to me , but the seller swears to it. Opinions, advice, or any input to this one??? Thanks guys
If it draws 2.2 KW on the start it will be around 2.95 HP.....
GURU is only a name.
Adam
BCjohnny
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:07 pm
Location: Black Country, England

Re: Starter Question

Post by BCjohnny »

af2 wrote:
toolmakeron wrote:Here's another follow up question,the choice I'm looking at is, 180 ft. lbs torque, OR 3 h.p.( is this all just marketing hype) The 3 h.p. sounds high to me , but the seller swears to it. Opinions, advice, or any input to this one??? Thanks guys
If it draws 2.2 KW on the start it will be around 2.95 HP.....
No it's not hype, I was doing 3hp 12v stuff more than twenty years ago. If you've room to fit, it's a good choice, and as said will get most things going. It's based on a 'diesel' motor. I'm moving back into this field and one product I am currently working on has motors in the 4hp+ range. Bit overkill, but too much is never enough.
Post Reply