stack filtration
Moderator: Team
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4576
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
- Location: Belgium - Koersel
Re: stack filtration
Thanks ! For the moment I have other things to deal with.
I'll report back as soon as I can work on this some more.
I'll report back as soon as I can work on this some more.
Re: stack filtration
In light of the foam socks being NFG I'm chasing something better.
It needs to be the usual things - small, light, very low restriction.
It'd also need to be a panel type, how about this? http://www.knfilters.com/search/product ... od=KA-7589
It needs to be the usual things - small, light, very low restriction.
It'd also need to be a panel type, how about this? http://www.knfilters.com/search/product ... od=KA-7589
Re: stack filtration
According to K&N's sizing formula: Square inches of filter required for a motor = CID x Maximum RPM / 20839, the model shown on the link (7.4" x 5.7", minus 1/2" W and H to account for flanges) would support a 350" engine to ~ 2,000 RPM...
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.
Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
Re: stack filtration
whats the formula for a cone filter? they have alot more area for the space consumed but i assume the flow is not uniform through the entire surface of a coneMadBill wrote:According to K&N's sizing formula: Square inches of filter required for a motor = CID x Maximum RPM / 20839, the model shown on the link (7.4" x 5.7", minus 1/2" W and H to account for flanges) would support a 350" engine to ~ 2,000 RPM...
Re: stack filtration
K&N don't differentiate between the various shapes. A conical filter is technically a 'frustum of a cone'. Here's the math formula: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConicalFrustum.html
Note that some have an internal cone as well, which would add a few square inches to the above result.
Note that some have an internal cone as well, which would add a few square inches to the above result.
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.
Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
Re: stack filtration
i am aware how to calculate the area but the effective area would be somewhat smallerMadBill wrote:K&N don't differentiate between the various shapes. A conical filter is technically a 'frustum of a cone'. Here's the math formula: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConicalFrustum.html
Note that some have an internal cone as well, which would add a few square inches to the above result.
Re: stack filtration
Fortunately my engine is 1.3 litres, or ~79 cubic inches.MadBill wrote:According to K&N's sizing formula: Square inches of filter required for a motor = CID x Maximum RPM / 20839, the model shown on the link (7.4" x 5.7", minus 1/2" W and H to account for flanges) would support a 350" engine to ~ 2,000 RPM...
Re: stack filtration
Instead of burying the formula in the catalog, it would be useful if K&N (and others) just listed the effective area in the specs for each p.n..digger wrote:i am aware how to calculate the area but the effective area would be somewhat smallerMadBill wrote:K&N don't differentiate between the various shapes. A conical filter is technically a 'frustum of a cone'. Here's the math formula: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConicalFrustum.html
Note that some have an internal cone as well, which would add a few square inches to the above result.
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.
Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
-
- HotPass
- Posts: 9392
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:41 am
- Location:
Re: stack filtration
http://www.google.com/patents/US4498915 You might find the discussion by the inventor interesting.digger wrote: i am aware how to calculate the area but the effective area would be somewhat smaller
Driving Force Online: BREAKING NEWS—Ohio Governor Signs SEMA-Supported Vehicle Freedom Bill Into Law!
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4576
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
- Location: Belgium - Koersel
Re: stack filtration
Coming back to this with results : as the engine has been started on the itb's and I've driven around the block for a short test drive a note on the results with the sock filter (unifilter). I put it on before driving around the block. During a startup, it decided to do a little backfire, when I saw smoke coming from under the hood...thought the car was on fire. With a fire extinguisher at hand I opened the hood, no fire but smoke was coming off the socks. Pulled them of in a hurry and threw them on the side.
Meanwhile I have tested a piece of it with a lighter and they do catch fire easily.
I guess I will be looking at an airbox sooner than I thought.
Meanwhile I have tested a piece of it with a lighter and they do catch fire easily.
I guess I will be looking at an airbox sooner than I thought.
Re: stack filtration
Who could conceivably have anticipated the possibility of a backfire as they were designing an air filter? Probably the same guy that came up with cellophane ash trays...
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.
Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
-
- HotPass
- Posts: 9392
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:41 am
- Location:
Re: stack filtration
"There's no product that can't be made cheaper and worse."
Driving Force Online: BREAKING NEWS—Ohio Governor Signs SEMA-Supported Vehicle Freedom Bill Into Law!
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4576
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
- Location: Belgium - Koersel
Re: stack filtration
I've explored several possibilities in getting some sort of ducting/channel to fit on the stacks that have the bellmouths touching at the interface between 1+3, 5+7, 2+4 and 6+8 and at the same time staying under the hood lines, but not exactly working out.
What about making an airchamber over the valve covers (attached to them) and with a plate that slide over the back of the bellmouth and use some ducting from a pressurized source for cool filtered air. Now I wouldn't be able to get the airbox completly airthight however...
Constructor of the manifold only has metal mesh screen filters. Not good enough filtration, but anything is better than nothing. Maybe a combination of the chamber on the valve cover and that ??
If not, I might have to resort in trying to squeeze some flexible ducting over the stacks and route them over the manifold where I might be able to build a chamber to hold the filter...also a it defying the purpose of the stacks.
What about making an airchamber over the valve covers (attached to them) and with a plate that slide over the back of the bellmouth and use some ducting from a pressurized source for cool filtered air. Now I wouldn't be able to get the airbox completly airthight however...
Constructor of the manifold only has metal mesh screen filters. Not good enough filtration, but anything is better than nothing. Maybe a combination of the chamber on the valve cover and that ??
If not, I might have to resort in trying to squeeze some flexible ducting over the stacks and route them over the manifold where I might be able to build a chamber to hold the filter...also a it defying the purpose of the stacks.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1163
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:44 pm
- Location: Australia
Re: stack filtration
Like you are thinking, I would stick an air cleaner in each wheel well or some place similar and feed this air into a plenum over the valve covers encompassing the trumpets. Do you have much clearance from the trumpets to hood? Might be difficult to keep dry though, depending on your filter placement.