stack filtration

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

twl
Expert
Expert
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:13 am
Location:

Re: stack filtration

Post by twl »

If you have the room, larger is always better for that kind of thing.
Belgian1979
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4576
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Belgium - Koersel

Re: stack filtration

Post by Belgian1979 »

Thanks ! For the moment I have other things to deal with.

I'll report back as soon as I can work on this some more.
Billzilla
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:48 pm
Location: Gold Coast, Australia

Re: stack filtration

Post by Billzilla »

In light of the foam socks being NFG I'm chasing something better.
It needs to be the usual things - small, light, very low restriction.
It'd also need to be a panel type, how about this? http://www.knfilters.com/search/product ... od=KA-7589
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: stack filtration

Post by MadBill »

According to K&N's sizing formula: Square inches of filter required for a motor = CID x Maximum RPM / 20839, the model shown on the link (7.4" x 5.7", minus 1/2" W and H to account for flanges) would support a 350" engine to ~ 2,000 RPM...
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
digger
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2722
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:39 am
Location:

Re: stack filtration

Post by digger »

MadBill wrote:According to K&N's sizing formula: Square inches of filter required for a motor = CID x Maximum RPM / 20839, the model shown on the link (7.4" x 5.7", minus 1/2" W and H to account for flanges) would support a 350" engine to ~ 2,000 RPM...
whats the formula for a cone filter? they have alot more area for the space consumed but i assume the flow is not uniform through the entire surface of a cone
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: stack filtration

Post by MadBill »

K&N don't differentiate between the various shapes. A conical filter is technically a 'frustum of a cone'. Here's the math formula: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConicalFrustum.html
Note that some have an internal cone as well, which would add a few square inches to the above result.
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
digger
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2722
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:39 am
Location:

Re: stack filtration

Post by digger »

MadBill wrote:K&N don't differentiate between the various shapes. A conical filter is technically a 'frustum of a cone'. Here's the math formula: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConicalFrustum.html
Note that some have an internal cone as well, which would add a few square inches to the above result.
i am aware how to calculate the area but the effective area would be somewhat smaller
Billzilla
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:48 pm
Location: Gold Coast, Australia

Re: stack filtration

Post by Billzilla »

MadBill wrote:According to K&N's sizing formula: Square inches of filter required for a motor = CID x Maximum RPM / 20839, the model shown on the link (7.4" x 5.7", minus 1/2" W and H to account for flanges) would support a 350" engine to ~ 2,000 RPM...
Fortunately my engine is 1.3 litres, or ~79 cubic inches.
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: stack filtration

Post by MadBill »

digger wrote:
MadBill wrote:K&N don't differentiate between the various shapes. A conical filter is technically a 'frustum of a cone'. Here's the math formula: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConicalFrustum.html
Note that some have an internal cone as well, which would add a few square inches to the above result.
i am aware how to calculate the area but the effective area would be somewhat smaller
Instead of burying the formula in the catalog, it would be useful if K&N (and others) just listed the effective area in the specs for each p.n..
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
Kevin Johnson
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 9392
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:41 am
Location:

Re: stack filtration

Post by Kevin Johnson »

digger wrote: i am aware how to calculate the area but the effective area would be somewhat smaller
http://www.google.com/patents/US4498915 You might find the discussion by the inventor interesting.
Driving Force Online: BREAKING NEWS—Ohio Governor Signs SEMA-Supported Vehicle Freedom Bill Into Law!
Belgian1979
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4576
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Belgium - Koersel

Re: stack filtration

Post by Belgian1979 »

Coming back to this with results : as the engine has been started on the itb's and I've driven around the block for a short test drive a note on the results with the sock filter (unifilter). I put it on before driving around the block. During a startup, it decided to do a little backfire, when I saw smoke coming from under the hood...thought the car was on fire. With a fire extinguisher at hand I opened the hood, no fire but smoke was coming off the socks. Pulled them of in a hurry and threw them on the side.

Meanwhile I have tested a piece of it with a lighter and they do catch fire easily.

I guess I will be looking at an airbox sooner than I thought.
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: stack filtration

Post by MadBill »

Who could conceivably have anticipated the possibility of a backfire as they were designing an air filter? =P~ =P~ Probably the same guy that came up with cellophane ash trays... #-o
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
Kevin Johnson
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 9392
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:41 am
Location:

Re: stack filtration

Post by Kevin Johnson »

"There's no product that can't be made cheaper and worse."
Driving Force Online: BREAKING NEWS—Ohio Governor Signs SEMA-Supported Vehicle Freedom Bill Into Law!
Belgian1979
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4576
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Belgium - Koersel

Re: stack filtration

Post by Belgian1979 »

I've explored several possibilities in getting some sort of ducting/channel to fit on the stacks that have the bellmouths touching at the interface between 1+3, 5+7, 2+4 and 6+8 and at the same time staying under the hood lines, but not exactly working out.

What about making an airchamber over the valve covers (attached to them) and with a plate that slide over the back of the bellmouth and use some ducting from a pressurized source for cool filtered air. Now I wouldn't be able to get the airbox completly airthight however...
Constructor of the manifold only has metal mesh screen filters. Not good enough filtration, but anything is better than nothing. Maybe a combination of the chamber on the valve cover and that ??

If not, I might have to resort in trying to squeeze some flexible ducting over the stacks and route them over the manifold where I might be able to build a chamber to hold the filter...also a it defying the purpose of the stacks.
Cubic_Cleveland
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1163
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:44 pm
Location: Australia

Re: stack filtration

Post by Cubic_Cleveland »

Like you are thinking, I would stick an air cleaner in each wheel well or some place similar and feed this air into a plenum over the valve covers encompassing the trumpets. Do you have much clearance from the trumpets to hood? Might be difficult to keep dry though, depending on your filter placement.
Post Reply