Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

chimpvalet
Pro
Pro
Posts: 451
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:02 am
Location:

Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by chimpvalet »

I've a nodular iron crank for an inline 4 cyl that's perfect in all bearing surfaces except the thrust flange. Damage to the flange arising out of oiling or assembly issues was discovered on disassembly and has been ground out leaving a thinner flange by perhaps 0.080". It looks just a little sketchy to my eye but might hold up to clutch loads. Other thoughts are welding up the flange ( thermal fractures to consider ), or adapting a different main bearing with integral thrust faces bearing up to a crank throw. Any advice?

Steve
ProPower engines
Guru
Guru
Posts: 8707
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:16 pm
Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by ProPower engines »

chimpvalet wrote:I've a nodular iron crank for an inline 4 cyl that's perfect in all bearing surfaces except the thrust flange. Damage to the flange arising out of oiling or assembly issues was discovered on disassembly and has been ground out leaving a thinner flange by perhaps 0.080". It looks just a little sketchy to my eye but might hold up to clutch loads. Other thoughts are welding up the flange ( thermal fractures to consider ), or adapting a different main bearing with integral thrust faces bearing up to a crank throw. Any advice?

Steve

What engine??
Real Race Cars Don't Have Doors
BCjohnny
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:07 pm
Location: Black Country, England

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by BCjohnny »

Unless it's unobtainium, or had a lot of money invested in it, bin it and use another one.
clshore
Expert
Expert
Posts: 703
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:48 pm
Location: Beverly Hills, FL

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by clshore »

Does this motor use the C shaped half moon thrust washers, or are they integral with one of the mains?

Triumph use half moon TW, and they are problematic, but you can get solid bronze replacements in desired thickness:

http://customthrustwashers.com/

It's not hard to make replacement half moons, but for the price, avoids the time and trouble of DIY.
allencr267
Pro
Pro
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:28 pm
Location: Tallahassee Florida USofA

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by allencr267 »

clshore wrote:Does this motor use the C shaped half moon thrust washers, or are they integral with one of the mains?
Put a shim behind them if separate.
Dan Timberlake
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1747
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:10 pm
Location:

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by Dan Timberlake »

How are you reducing crank end play, and restoring fairly accurate axial positioning?

As far as keeping the problem from repeating, is this a standard shift application ? Driving habits of Prolonged clutch release has killed more than one steel crank thrust bearing.

Nodular iron has the rep of requiring very specific finishing to achieve good results even in full hydrodynamic conditions, which the thrust bearing is not.
http://www.stealth316.com/misc/clevite- ... polish.pdf
wyrmrider
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6941
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:52 pm
Location:

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by wyrmrider »

you can chamfer the mains parting line from the oil groove back to get some additional oil flow
and drill through the thrust (about .060 and make a pocket) then about .040 through the main web into the oil feed
for pressure oiling
IMHO the thrust pushes against the crank so the oil gap on the front is much bigger and easier for the oil to go that way than to oil the thrust
clshore
Expert
Expert
Posts: 703
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:48 pm
Location: Beverly Hills, FL

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by clshore »

allencr267 wrote:
clshore wrote:Does this motor use the C shaped half moon thrust washers, or are they integral with one of the mains?
Put a shim behind them if separate.
Most half moon TW are steel backing with a thin layer of bearing material.
That construction works well with the mains and rods, since they operate mostly in full hydrodynamic mode with an oil film between, and actual contact is rare.

But TW seldom operate in full HD mode, and contact predominates, leading to wear in actual service.
Once the thin layer of bearing material is gone, you have steel-steel contact, not a very good combo.
So a solid bronze TW is really a more durable solution.

A shim might work OK, but OP was talking about 0.080" additional clearance.
Takes about the same work to make a shim that thick as a solid TW.

Also, how is the TW retained?
Many just sit on the bearing cap ledge, if the shim is too thick, there's nothing left to hold the TW, unless you connect the shim and TW together.
robert1
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2539
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:26 pm
Location: missippippi

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by robert1 »

here's a repair I did on a SBC a few years back.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
clshore
Expert
Expert
Posts: 703
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:48 pm
Location: Beverly Hills, FL

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by clshore »

Yup,
looks nice.
I prefer to use brass flat headed screws, JIC the washer gets worn down, avoids steel-steel contact.

You can get cored bearing bronze by the inch from usual metal suspects, use lathe to turn ID/OD to size, use a parting tool to slice off thickness you need.
Cut ring in half, voila, TW set!
chimpvalet
Pro
Pro
Posts: 451
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:02 am
Location:

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by chimpvalet »

Glad to read so much response, thanks all! The motor is a Lotus 910, using the Vandervell half-moon shaped thrust bearings. The oiling mod chamfer remedy was distributed by Lotus in a TSB some years ago and I've so noted the need for that. The car is an Esprit, so standard trans only. The custom bronze bearings are something I'll look into for sure, stock retention is by way of a relief fly-cut into the #5 main bearing saddle in the block, the bearing then blocked in place once the lower half bearing support is brought into position.
Steve
chimpvalet
Pro
Pro
Posts: 451
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:02 am
Location:

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by chimpvalet »

To ProPower and BCJohnny, the stroke increase provided by this crank is good for quite substantial gains in torque curve by all accounts. Rather costly to replace these, as well, hence the desire to see if worth salvaging. So beyond the return to dimensional spec in all aspects pertaining to the thrust bearing mount, and perhaps obtaining better bearings there's also the question of adequate meat remaining in the crank flange that takes the thrust load. Anyone care to suggest what would be a minimum acceptable thickness for the flange at it's base on the journal's edge? As said, there was metal taken out in cleaning up the face. Is it the consensus not to weld up that surface if judged too marginal for the job?
Steve
ProPower engines
Guru
Guru
Posts: 8707
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:16 pm
Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by ProPower engines »

chimpvalet wrote:To ProPower and BCJohnny, the stroke increase provided by this crank is good for quite substantial gains in torque curve by all accounts. Rather costly to replace these, as well, hence the desire to see if worth salvaging. So beyond the return to dimensional spec in all aspects pertaining to the thrust bearing mount, and perhaps obtaining better bearings there's also the question of adequate meat remaining in the crank flange that takes the thrust load. Anyone care to suggest what would be a minimum acceptable thickness for the flange at it's base on the journal's edge? As said, there was metal taken out in cleaning up the face. Is it the consensus not to weld up that surface if judged too marginal for the job?
Steve

If its a steel shaft and an under size bearing is available then just have it welded and re-grind to needed dimensions of the std thrust bearing.
Since this seems to be problematic the thrust material repair may be as suggested and use a more suitable material machined to fit the cap and add the extra lube hole to avoid doing this again.
Real Race Cars Don't Have Doors
clshore
Expert
Expert
Posts: 703
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:48 pm
Location: Beverly Hills, FL

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by clshore »

The thrust load is almost entirely due to clutch plate pressure when pedal is depressed.
I can't see that as more than 400 lb, but you could measure it easily enough.

The point being that it's not a major load, and doesn't have a very high duty cycle.

If you fit solid TW, it's unlikely to see any significant wear in the future, I'd not weld it at this time.
Dan Timberlake
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1747
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:10 pm
Location:

Re: Crank Thrust Surface Trouble

Post by Dan Timberlake »

Hi ChimpValet,

Is this what you crank looks like, with the worn thrust face being the "front" face of the now 0.08" thinnner flywheel flange?
https://zhvmsq.bay.livefilestore.com/y1 ... CF9383.JPG

Do you know the operating history to understand why the thrust surface wore so badly? Prolonged time depressing the clutch is my guess. I imagine once the surfaces deteriorate at all the wear just takes off.

To make a thrust bearing hydrodynamic tricks must be played with the geometry. Industrial thrust bearings have tilting pads and carefully placed oil inlets to form a hydrodynamic oil wedge, which is necessary to support a thrust load for very long.
http://www.tpub.com/machines/1.htm159.gif

Adding insert edge chamfers for oil flow might help, but I think details like tapered pockets in the bearing thrust face likely help a lot, since stock bearings often are pretty featureless.
http://www.stealth316.com/misc/clevite- ... arings.pdf
And surface finish and direction of polishing really count when the going gets tough.
Post Reply