Don Terrill’s Speed-Talk

randy331 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:32 pm

GARY C wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 10:57 pm True but in the context of why this question was asked $20,000.00 is still $20,000.00 regardless of how you divide it and time is money even if you get machine work and dyno time for free (some don't) and your left with what you can re coupe for the used engine or engines in some cases if you don't win the big prize money and this would only get more costly if your goal was to beat everyone in the competition.

I agree that money alone will not win this but you and I both know how much is spent to get to the winners circle.

I am not discounting what you guys have accomplished I just don't believe in mis leading people to think something other than the truth!

If you don't believe in misleading people,.. then I'd stop throwing around $20,000. And certainly $50,000-$75,000 price tag.
In reality Rick, me, Chad, and Joe threw our time in for free. No doubt we all could have made money instead. But cost on parts, Joe may come out ahead on that. He runs a race engine shop. Race parts lay around in his shop everywhere there. There's always a use for lightly used parts.

Travel, motel, dining etc, it all cost money. I went to Alaska a few years back. It was fun and I enjoyed it for sure,... but Alaska is very lacking in engine talk, and they didn't give me a trophy. I drove out to the drag strip, but it was closed.
Went up to a circle track, closed too.
Lots of salmon fishing talk. Talk of bears. Whale talk. No TQ/cubes talk anywhere.
But Alaska wasn't free either. But I did get a nice ride in a Cessna Caravan up the coast. That was cool,..but I don't think it gained us any EMC points.

Depends on what you want to spend your time and money on.

Randy

Amilcar wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:49 pm Rick/Randy,

Do you guys have used some kind of engine simulation (EA.PRO/Dynomation)to help on see some "trends" on what/how to test next?

Rick360 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:41 am Who knows what it would cost YOU because I don't know your location, abilities or resources. Things I may do myself without thinking you may have to drive 100 miles to pay to have done. Do you have a collection of race parts from years past? Many of the parts were already in hand before entering EMC from other projects or planned projects. Do you want to count the new Jesel belt drive I bought for testing? It'll be used for testing future engines too. Some Companies give discounts for EMC competitors hoping their parts end up in the winning engine for the mag articles.

When I buy a set of bare heads or intake and port them and run them on my own car and later sell them, I've never sold them for less than I paid for the parts new. Racing is an expensive hobby if you have to pay someone to do everything.

One thing is for sure, the amount we spent was an amount we were all OK spending with nothing but the pieces when we were done. The parts in the engine at EMC and normal machine work (bore/hone, vj, deck etc) was $10k or less. But, how can you put a price on porting heads for a winning EMC engine? I wouldn't know where to buy them cause Randy doesn't do that for a living.

Rick

Rick360 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:58 am

Amilcar wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:49 pm Rick/Randy,

Do you guys have used some kind of engine simulation (EA.PRO/Dynomation)to help on see some "trends" on what/how to test next?

I have used Engine Pro by Patrick Hale (sold here on ST in the bundle) for 20 years or so and have learned some important relationships using it. It works real good for more race type engines but lower rpm broad TQ curve EMC type engines it gets some stuff wrong. I've had Dynomation5 for a few years and haven't found it very useful. Haven't tried other sim programs. Use Pipemax for some calculations but it predicts wrong header size for this engine.

Shape in a head/intake is so important for HP and in determining the size it needs to be and there is no good way to quantify that in a computer program. Using a spreadsheet with our own velocity/sizing formulas is better because it is based on how our ports are shaped.

Rick

GARY C wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:46 pm if a guy like me without the free access of above mentioned stuff was going to try to enter next years competition?"

...Just because you got a free ride doesn't mean someone didn't have to pay for it!

randy331 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:24 am

GARY C wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:46 pm if a guy like me without the free access of above mentioned stuff was going to try to enter next years competition?"

...Just because you got a free ride doesn't mean someone didn't have to pay for it!

Joe is already talking about doing it again next year. I probably shouldn't take the time 2 years in a row. Call him up and tell him you'll do the heads/intake/spec cams to test. You'll buy some headers and oil pans you think will score good. And, go to his shop to do the dynoing. Then you'll have that free ride you talk about.

I'll go truck pulling next year.

Randy

steve316 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:05 am Gary C if you don't want to do EMC that is your choice. But stop making excuses; $6000 to get in on a team would be a bargain because after competition you could sell parts and get at least half your money back.

steve316 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:05 am Gary C if you don't want to do EMC that is your choice. But stop making excuses; $6000 to get in on a team would be a bargain because after competition you could sell parts and get at least half your money back.

randy331 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:13 am

steve316 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:05 am Gary C if you don't want to do EMC that is your choice. But stop making excuses; $6000 to get in on a team would be a bargain because after competition you could sell parts and get at least half your money back.

Just heard from the shop and the 391 cube we tested was back on the dyno with less rocker getting tuned up. It's sold and will be at the race track this weekend. Just as we tested it but less rocker, different oil pan and customers carb..

I'm sure Joe made money on it. His customers don't come in there expecting things for free.

Randy

GARY C wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:06 am You and I both know why you posted what you posted and why you want to play off the actually cost incurred from start to finish, at least now I know I can believe "half" of what you post!

Walter R. Malik wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:17 pm

GARY C wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:06 am You and I both know why you posted what you posted and why you want to play off the actually cost incurred from start to finish, at least now I know I can believe "half" of what you post!

Simply to exist in this world cost money. When you have a limited amount of money, It just depends upon where you wish to spend it and how you wish to sacrifice.

Personally ... eating hot dogs, salami and cheese sandwiches and sometimes buying some jelly to put on the peanut butter sandwiches throughout the year is the sacrifice I made to afford what I built.
My brother is a boater and he spent a whole lot more money than me this past summer and gets absolutely no monetary return at all for his costs.

Rick and Randy are totally correct ... it merely depends upon the priority and WHERE you elect to spend whatever money you have; the final cost of doing that engine is really immaterial.

GARY C wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:27 pm

Walter R. Malik wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:17 pm

GARY C wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:06 am You and I both know why you posted what you posted and why you want to play off the actually cost incurred from start to finish, at least now I know I can believe "half" of what you post!

Simply to exist in this world cost money. When you have a limited amount of money, It just depends upon where you wish to spend it and how you wish to sacrifice.

Personally ... eating hot dogs, salami and cheese sandwiches and sometimes buying some jelly to put on the peanut butter sandwiches throughout the year is the sacrifice I made to afford what I built.
My brother is a boater and he spent a whole lot more money than me this past summer and gets absolutely no monetary return at all for his costs.

Rick and Randy are totally correct ... it merely depends upon the priority and WHERE you elect to spend whatever money you have; the final cost of doing that engine is really immaterial.

That still doesn't change what it cost.
EDIT! I don't have a problem with what it cost, I have built my share of cars and engines because I wanted to and not for resale or profit.

Walter R. Malik wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:05 pm

GARY C wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:27 pm

Walter R. Malik wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:17 pm

Simply to exist in this world cost money. When you have a limited amount of money, It just depends upon where you wish to spend it and how you wish to sacrifice.

Personally ... eating hot dogs, salami and cheese sandwiches and sometimes buying some jelly to put on the peanut butter sandwiches throughout the year is the sacrifice I made to afford what I built.
My brother is a boater and he spent a whole lot more money than me this past summer and gets absolutely no monetary return at all for his costs.

Rick and Randy are totally correct ... it merely depends upon the priority and WHERE you elect to spend whatever money you have; the final cost of doing that engine is really immaterial.

That still doesn't change what it cost.
EDIT! I don't have a problem with what it cost, I have built my share of cars and engines because I wanted to and not for resale or profit.

No ... it doesn't change the cost but, it just doesn't matter to anyone except to some who are not even involved.

I, and probably a lot of others, never kept track and don't plan on going backward to figure it out just because someone else wants to know.