Race Engine Challenge II

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
Gregory
Member
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:01 am
Location: Charlotte

Race Engine Challenge II

Post by Gregory » Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:20 am

This is the new thread for Race Engine Challenge. Let's keep it on topic - tech ideas for a new engine contest. For those of
you new to this topic, go to the web page for details (www.RaceEngineChallenge.com).
The guiding light for our first contest is an engine for a strong street/strip engine. In 2019 we plan on having two classes.
As stated on the web page the rules will be released at the PRI show.
Now it's your turn.
Greg Finnican
Charlotte, NC
704 408-7356

User avatar
RAMM
Expert
Expert
Posts: 509
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by RAMM » Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:21 am

I've got an idea Greg and its one that will keep this contest on the up and up and also keep the Correction Factor B.S. to a minimum. I suggest displaying for all to see and keep an eye on from the beginning of the contest to the conclusion is the dyno's Torque Co-Efficient Value--mine is currently 470.13 ft/lb / Volt. The Correction Factor does not influence this but the torque arm and weights do. Put this on display for all to see and it will keep everyone honest. J.Rob
New and improved website under construction.Check the blog for relevant info
http://skmfxengines.blogspot.com/

User avatar
RAMM
Expert
Expert
Posts: 509
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by RAMM » Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:23 am

Also after watching this year's Traditional Muscle Class play out at UNOH I gotta say the rules were quite well thought out by Adger. I would emulate these if you want some seriously scienced out entries. J.Rob
New and improved website under construction.Check the blog for relevant info
http://skmfxengines.blogspot.com/

David Vizard
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:19 pm

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by David Vizard » Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:38 am

RAMM wrote:
Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:23 am
Also after watching this year's Traditional Muscle Class play out at UNOH I gotta say the rules were quite well thought out by Adger. I would emulate these if you want some seriously scienced out entries. J.Rob
Got a link to this??
DV
David Vizard Small Group Performance Seminars - held about every 4 weeks. My shop or your shop. Contact seminar organizer at marvingvx@gmail.com for details.

User avatar
RAMM
Expert
Expert
Posts: 509
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by RAMM » Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:50 am

The rules or the Facebook videos? J.Rob
New and improved website under construction.Check the blog for relevant info
http://skmfxengines.blogspot.com/

David Vizard
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:19 pm

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by David Vizard » Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:03 am

RAMM wrote:
Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:50 am
The rules or the Facebook videos? J.Rob
Both if you have them please?
DV
David Vizard Small Group Performance Seminars - held about every 4 weeks. My shop or your shop. Contact seminar organizer at marvingvx@gmail.com for details.

User avatar
RAMM
Expert
Expert
Posts: 509
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by RAMM » Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:25 am

First link is Facebook-scroll down on left side and click videos-they are all there. J.Rob

https://www.facebook.com/hotrodmag/

http://st.hotrod.com/uploads/sites/21/2 ... 092117.pdf
New and improved website under construction.Check the blog for relevant info
http://skmfxengines.blogspot.com/

Walter R. Malik
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
Contact:

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by Walter R. Malik » Fri Oct 13, 2017 4:21 pm

RAMM wrote:
Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:23 am
Also after watching this year's Traditional Muscle Class play out at UNOH I gotta say the rules were quite well thought out by Adger. I would emulate these if you want some seriously scienced out entries. J.Rob
I must say that with just a few changes, I could agree.
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.

Joe-71
New Member
New Member
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: SA TX

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by Joe-71 » Sat Oct 14, 2017 10:27 pm

Greg: Some questions that I haven't seen answered are these: To what end is the engine being compared to? Street, Drag Race, Oval Track, Dirt Track, Street Stock, Pure Stock, Super Stock, Stock Eliminator, Road Race, Pro Stock, Naturally Aspirated, Power Adder? Cubic inch limits? Fuel requirements? Highest horsepower, highest torque, or highest average overall? Street headers, race headers, wet sump, dry sump, vacuum pump, just what are the parameters you seek? Is this the latest and greatest parts, or stock parts, or vintage parts? Cost factor limits? Single camshaft, multiple camshafts? Joe-71

Walter R. Malik
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
Contact:

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by Walter R. Malik » Sat Oct 14, 2017 11:58 pm

Joe-71 wrote:
Sat Oct 14, 2017 10:27 pm
Greg: Some questions that I haven't seen answered are these: To what end is the engine being compared to? Street, Drag Race, Oval Track, Dirt Track, Street Stock, Pure Stock, Super Stock, Stock Eliminator, Road Race, Pro Stock, Naturally Aspirated, Power Adder? Cubic inch limits? Fuel requirements? Highest horsepower, highest torque, or highest average overall? Street headers, race headers, wet sump, dry sump, vacuum pump, just what are the parameters you seek? Is this the latest and greatest parts, or stock parts, or vintage parts? Cost factor limits? Single camshaft, multiple camshafts? Joe-71
Greg has said somewhere in this forum that it will be an advanced street/strip type engine and the contest requirements will be released during the weekend of the PRI show in Indy.

He seems to be looking here to obtain some further ideas about those final rules.
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.

Joe-71
New Member
New Member
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:46 pm
Location: SA TX

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by Joe-71 » Sun Oct 15, 2017 1:20 pm

Having been involved with EMC for three years, I would like to see the rules stipulate that exotic remaking of a part not be acceptable in direct competition with the cast parts such as cylinder heads. Modifications limited to porting, filling, or raising the floors, but not changing the entire port configuration, or adding plates to extend the head into the chambers. I sincerely respect Jon Kaase, but "one-off" experimental changes should be in a class all to themselves and a category for that type of build. Joe-71

User avatar
RAMM
Expert
Expert
Posts: 509
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by RAMM » Sun Oct 15, 2017 8:37 pm

Joe-71 wrote:
Sun Oct 15, 2017 1:20 pm
Having been involved with EMC for three years, I would like to see the rules stipulate that exotic remaking of a part not be acceptable in direct competition with the cast parts such as cylinder heads. Modifications limited to porting, filling, or raising the floors, but not changing the entire port configuration, or adding plates to extend the head into the chambers. I sincerely respect Jon Kaase, but "one-off" experimental changes should be in a class all to themselves and a category for that type of build. Joe-71
Strongly disagree. EMC has been a fantastic forum much like a Science Fair from school to truly TRY new things that would otherwise never get tested. I have no problem with the way Jon Kaase thinks because it is well within the rules. J.Rob
New and improved website under construction.Check the blog for relevant info
http://skmfxengines.blogspot.com/

User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 8229
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by CamKing » Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:16 am

Joe-71 wrote:
Sun Oct 15, 2017 1:20 pm
Having been involved with EMC for three years, I would like to see the rules stipulate that exotic remaking of a part not be acceptable in direct competition with the cast parts such as cylinder heads. Modifications limited to porting, filling, or raising the floors, but not changing the entire port configuration, or adding plates to extend the head into the chambers. I sincerely respect Jon Kaase, but "one-off" experimental changes should be in a class all to themselves and a category for that type of build. Joe-71
My comments to Greg were, since these engines are supposed to represent engines that would be built for customers, for street/strip performance, the rules should reflect that. Things like spending $20K on cam development is really not something a street/strip customer is going to pay for, so it shouldn't be part of this competition. I'm sure if someone spent the money to make a manifold that changed runner length as the RPM changed, would have a huge advantage, but it really wouldn't fit the spirit of the competition.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs
Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
(704)489-2449

GARY C
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3386
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by GARY C » Mon Oct 16, 2017 12:50 pm

CamKing wrote:
Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:16 am
Joe-71 wrote:
Sun Oct 15, 2017 1:20 pm
Having been involved with EMC for three years, I would like to see the rules stipulate that exotic remaking of a part not be acceptable in direct competition with the cast parts such as cylinder heads. Modifications limited to porting, filling, or raising the floors, but not changing the entire port configuration, or adding plates to extend the head into the chambers. I sincerely respect Jon Kaase, but "one-off" experimental changes should be in a class all to themselves and a category for that type of build. Joe-71
My comments to Greg were, since these engines are supposed to represent engines that would be built for customers, for street/strip performance, the rules should reflect that. Things like spending $20K on cam development is really not something a street/strip customer is going to pay for, so it shouldn't be part of this competition. I'm sure if someone spent the money to make a manifold that changed runner length as the RPM changed, would have a huge advantage, but it really wouldn't fit the spirit of the competition.
How do you think that could be done?
In a competition how do you stop people with money from spending it to win?
Thats why my thought was to build according to a race with class rules like a lower level dirt track class and then have an open class with minimal rules.
There are so many ways to go and someone is not going to agree regardless.

Warp Speed
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2066
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
Location: NC

Re: Race Engine Challenge II

Post by Warp Speed » Mon Oct 16, 2017 1:04 pm

Money always wins, be it tight rules or none at all.

Post Reply