John Wallace wrote: ↑Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm So a head that flowzz 415 cfm is a lot better than a head that flowz 415 cfm?
(and a lot better than one that flows 415 cfm)
Should make a sticky out of this post.
Sums it up perfectly.
Moderator: Team
John Wallace wrote: ↑Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm So a head that flowzz 415 cfm is a lot better than a head that flowz 415 cfm?
(and a lot better than one that flows 415 cfm)
But a head that flowZZ 415 cfm makes even MORE power than one that only flowzz 415 cfm.statsystems wrote: ↑Sun Jun 10, 2018 2:24 pmJohn Wallace wrote: ↑Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm So a head that flowzz 415 cfm is a lot better than a head that flowz 415 cfm?
(and a lot better than one that flows 415 cfm)
Should make a sticky out of this post.
Sums it up perfectly.
On a better designed induction system you have more control of size shape and cs consistency, my comment was toward as cast 23 degree components. On a single depending on rpm and application you have between 3 and 3.5 sq in at the plenum tapering down to 2 sq in at the flange where a RPM Airgap is near 2 sq in from plenum to flange, on a street vs race tunnel ram you would see a size, length or taper difference.swampbuggy wrote: ↑Sun Jun 10, 2018 7:08 am Gary, Matt who is MBE cylinder heads said that they got away from taper in the port and there's more power there with less taper this is on high horsepower stuff. Mark H.
Thank you! I thought I was losing my mind. Or you guys were lol.
bigjoe1 wrote:By the way, I had a long talk with Harold(Brookshire) last year at the PRI show. We met at the airport and he told me everything he knew about everything.It was a nice visit. JOE SHERMAN RACING