valve job for flat deck head.

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
User avatar
cboggs
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: virginia beach, VA
Contact:

valve job for flat deck head.

Post by cboggs »

Darin, larry, .. anyone,

Do you guys have some ideas for this little project???

It's a round intake port, .. nice long short turn, no chamber, .. flat deck head with the chamber in the piston. Low cam lift, .350" max lift at valve.

OK, Ideas for the valve job, .. what would you try????

I've tried varius things, .. currently have, ..
.010" wide 30º top,
.051" wide 45º
.040" wide 60º
.120" wide 70º all sharp edge.
1.55" valve.

I'm at 90% at the 60 for my throat, .. but the 70º deeper in the bowl is around ( I gotta measure, forgot it ) 80% or so. It seems the sharp edge 70º help to get the flow turned as it does seem to help numbers on the bench at .250 up to .350"

I was thinking of trying a wider 60º, .. like .060" or so, reducing my throat to around 85% ????

Thanks,

Curtis
Race Flow Development
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com
Guest

Post by Guest »

What diesel are you working with?
User avatar
cboggs
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: virginia beach, VA
Contact:

Post by cboggs »

Anonymous wrote:What diesel are you working with?
It's not a diesel, it's a 4 cylinder gas engine. Raod race.

Curtis
Race Flow Development
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com
shawn
Expert
Expert
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 12:09 pm
Location: Northwest
Contact:

Post by shawn »

i would think that a valve seat angle of about 35* would be a better choice with the lift being limited to .350.Have you tried different valves and back angles?
shawn
User avatar
cboggs
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: virginia beach, VA
Contact:

Post by cboggs »

shawn wrote:i would think that a valve seat angle of about 35* would be a better choice with the lift being limited to .350.Have you tried different valves and back angles?
shawn
Well, I guess I should have given all the info, .. :oops:

it's a restricted class engine, .. have to use a 45º seat and the stock valve with no back cut. Sooooo, .. I'm stuck playing with the top & bottom cuts, ..

I haven't tried it on the dyno, .. but I was thinking if I sunk the crap outa the valve to get some top angles, maybe a .040" wide 30º then a .020" wide 12º to the deck, would it help hp or even wet flow??
I know that combo doesn't look real good on the bench, .. but what does IT KNOW. :lol:

Curtis
Race Flow Development
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com
maxracesoftware
Vendor
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 4:04 pm
Location: Abbeville, LA
Contact:

Post by maxracesoftware »

it's a restricted class engine, .. have to use a 45º seat and the stock valve with no back cut. Sooooo, .. I'm stuck playing with the top & bottom cuts, ..

I haven't tried it on the dyno, .. but I was thinking if I sunk the crap outa the valve to get some top angles, maybe a .040" wide 30º then a .020" wide 12º to the deck, would it help hp or even wet flow??
with only .350" Valve Lift to work with..i don't think sinking the valve to get more top angle will help you ?...i think a .060 to .080" wide top angle will be all the Head will like ???

at .350" or lower Lifts...curtain area velocity fps is sky high...it just wants metal out the way, as Flow is shot off almost sideways at lower Lifts

at Higher Lifts...it wants the large top angle widths and gentle transisition to chamber from bowl/seat to maintain flow velocity fps and keep flow cone attached closer to valve head as valve head moves further from seat, thats why heads like 50/55/58/60 seat angles at higher lifts and with usually one very large 45 top angle transitioned into chamber

maybe trying out different Manufacturer's valve head shapes if that is Legal might pickup Flow gains ??
look for valve that has only .080 to .100" 45 angle width at most with "as made" sort of backcut or lower valve-head angle


.350" and less Lift is going to have all the Flow controlled by the
valve job and valve head shape , with the Short Turn just starting to effect Flow near .350" Lift and upwards
MaxRace Software
PipeMax and ET_Analyst for DragRacers
https://www.maxracesoftwares.com
tk
Show Guest
Show Guest
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 9:21 pm
Location: Laval, Quebec Canada
Contact:

Re: valve job for flat deck head.

Post by tk »

cboggs wrote:Darin, larry, .. anyone,

Do you guys have some ideas for this little project???

It's a round intake port, .. nice long short turn, no chamber, .. flat deck head with the chamber in the piston. Low cam lift, .350" max lift at valve.

OK, Ideas for the valve job, .. what would you try????

I've tried varius things, .. currently have, ..
.010" wide 30º top,
.051" wide 45º
.040" wide 60º
.120" wide 70º all sharp edge.
1.55" valve.

I'm at 90% at the 60 for my throat, .. but the 70º deeper in the bowl is around ( I gotta measure, forgot it ) 80% or so. It seems the sharp edge 70º help to get the flow turned as it does seem to help numbers on the bench at .250 up to .350"

I was thinking of trying a wider 60º, .. like .060" or so, reducing my throat to around 85% ????

Thanks,

Curtis
It almost sounds like a F1600 ( Cortina Ford) head :roll:

I have done a few and found lots of gains but when bolting on the intake and carb you loose most of the gains so I started all over again but this time i bolt on the intake and carb for each flow test...Its important to always use the same carb and intake because bolting on another changes everything again.

If you think that head is challenging try porting a VR6 VW head :shock:
Tom K.
www.tkrace.com
tkracehead@hotmail.com

I love motorsports because all other sports require only 1 ball!

Cheap...Powerful....Reliable...Choose only 2 of the 3
SWB

Post by SWB »

You need a smaller throat area (like 85%). I've found that smaller throat areas result in more flow at lower lifts. So I think you are on the right track.

I would not bother with any more top angle than you are already using.

SWB
User avatar
cboggs
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: virginia beach, VA
Contact:

Post by cboggs »

I'll try the smaller throat, . . makes sence to me too, ..

thanks for tossing this around guys. Nice thing about the net, .. can bounce things around, ..

Curtis
Race Flow Development
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com
STOCK 1090
New Member
New Member
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 11:27 am
Location: Voorhees, NJ

Post by STOCK 1090 »

If your rules allow, coat the back side of the intake valve. In some quick testing it showed a little gain in the very low lifts on a SBC. After about .4 lift the advantage was gone. Give it a shot.

3.2 % gain at .2 lift 118.3 to 122.1
1.8% gain at .3 lift 161.8 to 164.8
@ 28"
If you always do what you have always done,you will always get what you always got.
User avatar
cboggs
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: virginia beach, VA
Contact:

Post by cboggs »

Rich,

Interesting, .. didn't think of that.

The rules don't allow coatings, .. but there are stealth coatings around. :D

Curtis
Race Flow Development
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com
Post Reply