3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
Moderator: Team
-
- Guru
- Posts: 3285
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
- Location: NC
Re: 3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
There was obviously a geometrical change in the testing.......Ken_Parkman wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 11:30 am I once chased valvetrain deflections and found (much to my shock) that the stud deflections increased lift. The 7/16" studs reduced lift from 3/8"
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1575
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:54 pm
- Location: central Florida
Re: 3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
Flex , give a little, ok for a crankshaft and expected. Valvetrain not so much. Mark H.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:30 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: 3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
Same rocker, spring, pushrod, installation, height, everything except the stud and ball. Pulled one stud out, put the other one in.Warp Speed wrote: ↑Sat Sep 01, 2018 8:44 amThere was obviously a geometrical change in the testing.......Ken_Parkman wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 11:30 am I once chased valvetrain deflections and found (much to my shock) that the stud deflections increased lift. The 7/16" studs reduced lift from 3/8"
It started with measuring deflection with a stock rocker setup, and going "oh crap, look at how much loss of lift". So found a correct ball to fit the same rocker with a 7/16" hole and put in a bigger stud, obviously that will help, right? Wrong, lost another .020" lift. Back to 3/8" studs, got the lift back. Measured stud deflections, and found the sum of moments around the bend point caused the smaller stud to deflect toward the valve - increasing lift. The stiffer 7/16" stud deflected much less, but that caused loss of lift. Which meant the rocker itself was deflecting an absurd amount.
Who knows what effect this all has in a running engine, but it can't be good. A problem when rules require a stock rocker.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 3285
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
- Location: NC
Re: 3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
Like I said, a geometry change. The stud flex, as you pointed out caused the geometry change.
Still not a good thing, no matter the combination. Dynamically, it is an even bigger mess!
Still not a good thing, no matter the combination. Dynamically, it is an even bigger mess!
Re: 3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
Can I just re-tap my already threaded 3/8" stud holes to 7/16" studs using a fixture or a rigid drill press so they are square and in the correct location??
Vs hand drilling and re-tapping?
pdq67
Vs hand drilling and re-tapping?
pdq67
-
- Guru
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:19 am
- Location: MA
Re: 3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
Much easier to do it on a seat and guide machine.
Someone with a Sunnen VGS20 could knock that out quickly and shouldn’t be a lot of money.
Automotive Machining, cylinder head rebuilding, engine building. Can't seem to quit
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:35 pm
- Location:
Re: 3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
Paul, if you have a lathe, a tool post grinder, and centers in the end of the tap, you can grind a pilot on the tap about 1/2"-3/4" long and 3/8" in diameter. Use a taper tap and don't grind the pilot so long that you run out of taper on the tap. Done properly, this will work well for getting 7/16" threads in straight. But you will also probably need to cut some material off the top of the casting boss with a spot facer. I wouldn't do that without an accurate head holding fixture in a drill press or Bridgeport. Also I wouldn't do any of that just to use a set of old heads when AFR's and Brodix are SO MUCH better.
"Life is too short to not run a solid roller cam."
"Anything is possible, if you don't know what you're talking about."
I am NOT an Expert, and DEFINITELY NOT a GURU.
Kirkwoodken
"Anything is possible, if you don't know what you're talking about."
I am NOT an Expert, and DEFINITELY NOT a GURU.
Kirkwoodken
-
- New Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:20 pm
- Location: FL
Re: 3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
[quote=Ken_Parkman post_id=762944 time=1535814776 user_id=270]
[quote="Warp Speed" post_id=762908 time=1535805852 user_id=7362]
[quote=Ken_Parkman post_id=762554 time=1535643007 user_id=270]
I once chased valvetrain deflections and found (much to my shock) that the stud deflections [i]increased [/i]lift. The 7/16" studs reduced lift from 3/8"
[/quote]
There was obviously a geometrical change in the testing.......
[/quote]
Same rocker, spring, pushrod, installation, height, everything except the stud and ball. Pulled one stud out, put the other one in.
It started with measuring deflection with a stock rocker setup, and going "oh crap, look at how much loss of lift". So found a correct ball to fit the same rocker with a 7/16" hole and put in a bigger stud, obviously that will help, right? Wrong, lost another .020" lift. Back to 3/8" studs, got the lift back. Measured stud deflections, and found the sum of moments around the bend point caused the smaller stud to deflect toward the valve - [i][b]increasing[/b][/i] lift. The stiffer 7/16" stud deflected much less, but that caused loss of lift. Which meant the rocker itself was deflecting an absurd amount.
Who knows what effect this all has in a running engine, but it can't be good. A problem when rules require a stock rocker.
[/quote]
Was the spring a checking spring or the spring you run on the engine.
[quote="Warp Speed" post_id=762908 time=1535805852 user_id=7362]
[quote=Ken_Parkman post_id=762554 time=1535643007 user_id=270]
I once chased valvetrain deflections and found (much to my shock) that the stud deflections [i]increased [/i]lift. The 7/16" studs reduced lift from 3/8"
[/quote]
There was obviously a geometrical change in the testing.......
[/quote]
Same rocker, spring, pushrod, installation, height, everything except the stud and ball. Pulled one stud out, put the other one in.
It started with measuring deflection with a stock rocker setup, and going "oh crap, look at how much loss of lift". So found a correct ball to fit the same rocker with a 7/16" hole and put in a bigger stud, obviously that will help, right? Wrong, lost another .020" lift. Back to 3/8" studs, got the lift back. Measured stud deflections, and found the sum of moments around the bend point caused the smaller stud to deflect toward the valve - [i][b]increasing[/b][/i] lift. The stiffer 7/16" stud deflected much less, but that caused loss of lift. Which meant the rocker itself was deflecting an absurd amount.
Who knows what effect this all has in a running engine, but it can't be good. A problem when rules require a stock rocker.
[/quote]
Was the spring a checking spring or the spring you run on the engine.
Re: 3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
The stud holes are 3/8" which is the correct size for a 7/16×14 tap.
Monty Frerichs
B&M Machine
B&M Machine
-
- Expert
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:30 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: 3/8” or 7/16” rocker studs?
With the checking spring everything was nice and the rockers measured ratio as specified. Put the real spring on and things started moving.Kevin Willis wrote: ↑Sun Sep 02, 2018 3:54 pm
Was the spring a checking spring or the spring you run on the engine.