Hey all:
I found these new mounts the other day, and thought they were pretty neat. http://www.allstarperformance.com/product.htm?prod=772
What are your thoughts about using these in a street stock, in place of Energy urethane mounts? It seems to be a good way to add some rigidity to the front of the frame where we can't add any tubing(like a front hoop)
With a stock frame car, would it be wise to retain the Energy trans mount (TH350) to allow some flex absorption?
I welcome all suggestions.
RR
Solid Mounts or Not?
Moderator: Team
Racer Roy, they look like a very nice alterative and certainly should strengthen that front crossmember, I would use them with no fears, on that rear mount, I think that urathane rear would give the trans case some flexibility so it doesn't crack, but my experiance only comes from using powerglides on a 1/2 mile good clay track with bite.
-
- Pro
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:24 pm
- Location: OHIO
- Contact:
trans mount
Never use a solid mount on an automatic transmission
Learned that one the hard way altho it now makes a good mock up transmission because it is very light.
TI
Learned that one the hard way altho it now makes a good mock up transmission because it is very light.
TI
TORQUE RULES !!!!
I always use rubber mounts. Most engines anchor the mounts to the relatively flexible outer water jackets, but the way I look at it, it's silly to put money into precision machining of the block if you're going to start feeding chassis loads through it. And yes, I know Formula 1 cars do it, and they have special blocks designed for it, and I still say it's a bad idea.
As far as rear mounts... I've seen several broken transmission tail housings. The chassis can move around a lot under load, and the aluminum tailhousing takes torque loads it was never intended for.
As far as rear mounts... I've seen several broken transmission tail housings. The chassis can move around a lot under load, and the aluminum tailhousing takes torque loads it was never intended for.