turbo 400 vs powerglide

Transmission to Rear-end

Moderator: Team

Post Reply

turbo 400 vs powerglide

Post by guest » Tue Dec 28, 2004 2:10 pm

which trans would be faster 400 or powerglide in a 3400 lb car with 950 hp thanks


Post by Guest » Sun Jan 02, 2005 10:27 pm

Technically the PG should be quicker in a drag only application at that power level and weight - provided the converter and chassis setup is right. On a bang for the buck basis the TH wins hands down. Why not do the TH and spend the difference on some more weight dropping changes?



Post by Guest » Mon Jan 03, 2005 10:13 pm

I have about 950hp on spray..i run a turbo 400 i think its pretty quick..i think the 400 would be faster and the p/g would be more consistent...my 02 :D

Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:29 pm

Post by Floyd » Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:35 pm

I would pick a TH400 over the Glide in that heavy of an application. If you see any street time at all it's going to be a pain to get it going with a glide.

However if you're a bracket racer it's hard to argue or beat a glide.

Posts: 638
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:49 am
Location: NE.Phila.


Post by oldhead » Tue Aug 23, 2005 5:21 pm

My freind 78 Malibu,3100 lbs,948 hp. with nitrous 1474 hp. He was braking 400's, put in a PG. with the same conv..................SAME TIMES,et. mph, 60 ft.8.30 at 163 mph................400 had low firstgear.....OLDHEAD :D :D :D :D
Quicker then most

Posts: 1492
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Box Elder, SD

Post by SupStk » Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:39 pm

A racing buddy called his converter guy and was told, "Anything under 3,ooo# to use a glide over that a 350 or 400 would be quicker". If I remember right his 3600 lb SBC Chevelle was .02 quicker with the 400. In this case i would consider it a wash. In my opinion a high torgue engine may not need the low gear of the turbo.

Post Reply