The Science of Disinformation

Any topic with a chance of polarization - Not for the easily offended.

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
joe 90
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1969
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 4:02 am
Location: The land of the long white cloud

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by joe 90 » Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:00 am

I've never believed in the big bang either.
It's just a theory, nothing more.

Everything in the universe is cyclic.
Everything either rotates on it's own axis or rotates around something else.

It's been proven that light is bent by gravity ,
Therefore looking out into space with a telescope, you're not seeing in a straight line but around a curve or multiple curves.
Everything is an optical illusion and that's why there's missing dark matter.....due to gravitational lensing.

GARY C
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by GARY C » Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:14 am

joe 90 wrote:
Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:00 am
I've never believed in the big bang either.
It's just a theory, nothing more.

Everything in the universe is cyclic.
Everything either rotates on it's own axis or rotates around something else.

It's been proven that light is bent by gravity ,
Therefore looking out into space with a telescope, you're not seeing in a straight line but around a curve or multiple curves.
Everything is an optical illusion and that's why there's missing dark matter.....due to gravitational lensing.
Jason Lisle points out the difficulty in measure the speed of light.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vUel1AIM8w

joe 90
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1969
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 4:02 am
Location: The land of the long white cloud

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by joe 90 » Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:46 am

It's even more difficult to measure distance when science has defined the speed of light based on the length of rime it takes light to travel a certain distance.

How else could you measure distance?

GARY C
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by GARY C » Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:03 am

joe 90 wrote:
Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:46 am
It's even more difficult to measure distance when science has defined the speed of light based on the length of rime it takes light to travel a certain distance.

How else could you measure distance?
Measuring that distance is based on an unknown assumption.

exhaustgases
Expert
Expert
Posts: 986
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:03 pm

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by exhaustgases » Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:02 pm

joe 90 wrote:
Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:46 am
It's even more difficult to measure distance when science has defined the speed of light based on the length of rime it takes light to travel a certain distance.

How else could you measure distance?
Some physics as man understands it. They have now determined there is speed faster than light, I can prove it with a very simple analogy.

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5642
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by David Redszus » Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:28 am

exhaustgases wrote:
Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:02 pm
joe 90 wrote:
Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:46 am
It's even more difficult to measure distance when science has defined the speed of light based on the length of rime it takes light to travel a certain distance.

How else could you measure distance?
Some physics as man understands it. They have now determined there is speed faster than light, I can prove it with a very simple analogy.
The speed of light is determined by the medium through which it travels. It travels slower through water and fastest in a vacuum; which is the terminal speed of light.

Circlotron
Expert
Expert
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:56 am
Location: Melbourne, Straya

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by Circlotron » Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:27 am

And the speed of light is determined by how long it takes to travel a certain distance. That distance will appear different to a stationary vs a moving observer. Maybe just a poofteenth but probably enough to make a measurable difference.

mk e
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2997
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Elverson, PA

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by mk e » Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:08 am

Circlotron wrote:
Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:27 am
And the speed of light is determined by how long it takes to travel a certain distance. That distance will appear different to a stationary vs a moving observer. Maybe just a poofteenth but probably enough to make a measurable difference.
Each observer will measure the same speed of light regardless or their reference frame.
Mark
Mechanical Engineer

In-Tech
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1510
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:35 am

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by In-Tech » Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:02 pm

Yeah, so one time in band camp we were discussing the irregularity of a singularity and I was like WTF is a singularity anyhoo? \:D/ :-#
Heat is energy, energy is horsepower...but you gotta control the heat.
-Carl

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5642
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by David Redszus » Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:32 am

mk e wrote:
Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:08 am
Circlotron wrote:
Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:27 am
And the speed of light is determined by how long it takes to travel a certain distance. That distance will appear different to a stationary vs a moving observer. Maybe just a poofteenth but probably enough to make a measurable difference.
Each observer will measure the same speed of light regardless or their reference frame.
Right.

How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg?

Answer: four. No matter what you call it, a tail is still a tail, not a leg.

Fireonthemountain
Member
Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 11:17 pm

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by Fireonthemountain » Wed Nov 08, 2017 4:16 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:32 am
mk e wrote:
Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:08 am
Circlotron wrote:
Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:27 am
And the speed of light is determined by how long it takes to travel a certain distance. That distance will appear different to a stationary vs a moving observer. Maybe just a poofteenth but probably enough to make a measurable difference.
Each observer will measure the same speed of light regardless or their reference frame.
Right.


How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg?

Answer: four. No matter what you call it, a tail is still a tail, not a leg.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

And science is a guess and logic can be false and is called a tautology or Logical fallacy or False

Now on to the programming of Man Made Global warming now AKA as Climate Change.

Large numbers of eruptions since 1991 that have shifted the weather patterns and where the rain fell or didn't. This, plus a huge volcano melting Antarctica, shows none of this was caused by man, or any man made warming but volcanoes throughout history. The same ones they are now claiming that started the current warming that is currently us still currently out of the last iceage we are still in.

https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/anc ... 47.article

https://theqtimes.com/scientists-antarc ... -below/902

We haven't a clue of the world we live it :lol: :lol: :lol:

GARY C
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by GARY C » Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:33 pm

Fireonthemountain wrote:
Wed Nov 08, 2017 4:16 pm
David Redszus wrote:
Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:32 am
mk e wrote:
Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:08 am


Each observer will measure the same speed of light regardless or their reference frame.
Right.


How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg?

Answer: four. No matter what you call it, a tail is still a tail, not a leg.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

And science is a guess and logic can be false and is called a tautology or Logical fallacy or False

Now on to the programming of Man Made Global warming now AKA as Climate Change.

Large numbers of eruptions since 1991 that have shifted the weather patterns and where the rain fell or didn't. This, plus a huge volcano melting Antarctica, shows none of this was caused by man, or any man made warming but volcanoes throughout history. The same ones they are now claiming that started the current warming that is currently us still currently out of the last iceage we are still in.

https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/anc ... 47.article

https://theqtimes.com/scientists-antarc ... -below/902

We haven't a clue of the world we live it :lol: :lol: :lol:
More fake science that depends on flawed models to push on the masses.

mk e
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2997
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Elverson, PA

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by mk e » Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:02 am

David Redszus wrote:
Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:32 am
mk e wrote:
Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:08 am
Circlotron wrote:
Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:27 am
And the speed of light is determined by how long it takes to travel a certain distance. That distance will appear different to a stationary vs a moving observer. Maybe just a poofteenth but probably enough to make a measurable difference.
Each observer will measure the same speed of light regardless or their reference frame.
Right.

How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg?

Answer: four. No matter what you call it, a tail is still a tail, not a leg.
I pulled a dog out of my swimming pool last night.... poor tbing had it's front out but couldn't get his back half out, must half been freezing. No idea who's dog it was or how long he was stuck but his tail was sure wagging when he heard me say let's get you out of there. I stopped closing the gates now that there are no small kids around....never considered dogs.
Mark
Mechanical Engineer

exhaustgases
Expert
Expert
Posts: 986
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:03 pm

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by exhaustgases » Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:39 am

And the logic evades everyone. How can you prove there is speed faster than light? Yes hypothetical but still a proof. Bet ya all can't figure it out.

joe 90
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1969
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 4:02 am
Location: The land of the long white cloud

Re: The Science of Disinformation

Post by joe 90 » Fri Nov 10, 2017 7:02 am

I'm still waiting to hear all about who created the creator?



For some strange reason it never seems to get mentioned?

Must be a bit too hard?


To actually do a bit of brain work for a change instead of just quoting some numbers out of a book?

Post Reply