Victor Ram porting , Joe Sherman

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
joespanova
Expert
Expert
Posts: 693
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: McDonough Ga.

Victor Ram porting , Joe Sherman

Post by joespanova » Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:43 am

Joe Sherman or others who have experience with this t-ram.
Mine was port matched as the paperwork that came with it suggests. Meaning match port to heads up approx. an inch or 1.500 up in the port. In other words practically nothing other than a match.
The "width" of the port could be "widened" better at the TIGHTEST point to provide a better match to the heads........in other words , the port in the manifold gets tight towards the exit ( ABOUT A FEW INCHES or less UP THE PORT ) , then OPENS UP to match the head port entrance. IF I open up the cross section of the tight spot will the engine respond favorably to that?
This is a healthy drag race 377 , 14-1 , good roller etc etc.
modified wanna be

mag2555
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2062
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am

Re: Victor Ram porting , Joe Sherman

Post by mag2555 » Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:58 am

It may get tighter width wise but what about height wise?

In general you want the point of the least amount of port area to be one stroke length back up stream from the back side of the Intake valve and the runner should have a expanding taper to that minimum port area starting in the runner entry in the Plenum.

It sounds like in general, that yes you should rework that runner area to releave that pinch point.
If at that pinch point the runner has any curve to it then add port area by grinding on the outside wall of that curve , not the tight inner wall.

joespanova
Expert
Expert
Posts: 693
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: McDonough Ga.

Re: Victor Ram porting , Joe Sherman

Post by joespanova » Fri Nov 10, 2017 8:42 am

mag2555 wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:58 am
It may get tighter width wise but what about height wise?
It sounds like in general, that yes you should rework that runner area to releave that pinch point.
If at that pinch point the runner has any curve to it then add port area by grinding on the outside wall of that curve , not the tight inner wall.
HEIGHT wise..........I guess I could see if the roof can be raised some , there's not much material ( I think ).
As far as your reference to pinch point , the inner walls are fairly straight anyway , so I'm assuming you mean the opposite curved side.
modified wanna be

bigjoe1
Show Guest
Show Guest
Posts: 6159
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:16 pm
Location: santa ana calif-92703
Contact:

Re: Victor Ram porting , Joe Sherman

Post by bigjoe1 » Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:00 am

I have tried lots of different things on that manifold. When you make it bigger, it will pick up a very small amount of power on the top end ( 8000 and up ) BUT , it kills the mid range, say at 6000 to 6500 - On our best running 434, all I did was to cartridge roll the entrees and get a good port match.



JOE SHERMAN RACING

joespanova
Expert
Expert
Posts: 693
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: McDonough Ga.

Re: Victor Ram porting , Joe Sherman

Post by joespanova » Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:36 am

OK........
Thanks Joe.........guess I'll leave it alone.
modified wanna be

Frankshaft
Pro
Pro
Posts: 428
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 6:01 pm

Re: Victor Ram porting , Joe Sherman

Post by Frankshaft » Fri Nov 10, 2017 8:22 pm

bigjoe1 wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:00 am
I have tried lots of different things on that manifold. When you make it bigger, it will pick up a very small amount of power on the top end ( 8000 and up ) BUT , it kills the mid range, say at 6000 to 6500 - On our best running 434, all I did was to cartridge roll the entrees and get a good port match.



JOE SHERMAN RACING

If your running the engine 8000 and above, you should be running more than 6000-6500 converter. More like 7000+, so, the gain up top would be a positive. That is, if the car is set up right, and you want max et.

engineguyBill
Expert
Expert
Posts: 730
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:15 am
Location: Gold Canyon, AZ

Re: Victor Ram porting , Joe Sherman

Post by engineguyBill » Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:17 pm

Seems like most of the successful modifications to tunnel ram manifolds involve work that is done on the floor of the plenum . . . . . . .
Bill

SAE Member (25+ years)
ASE Master Certified Engine Machinist
AERA Certified Professional Engine Machinist

"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are."
- Theodore Roosevelt

joespanova
Expert
Expert
Posts: 693
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: McDonough Ga.

Re: Victor Ram porting , Joe Sherman

Post by joespanova » Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:08 pm

Frankshaft wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2017 8:22 pm
If your running the engine 8000 and above, you should be running more than 6000-6500 converter. More like 7000+, so, the gain up top would be a positive. That is, if the car is set up right, and you want max et.

Whats a "converter"?
modified wanna be

cgarb
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1379
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:50 am
Location: Maryland

Re: Victor Ram porting , Joe Sherman

Post by cgarb » Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:37 pm

It's sort of like an automatic clutch for weenies....lol. I guess I'm an bracket racing weenie by my own definition then.

Post Reply